Legal Position

Tentative Draft

Introduction

  As for my position of "custody", during a hearing that lasted about four minutes, on 02-25-2000, Children & Youth received the blessing of the court. Afterwards, on the way home I stopped off at my sister's law office and told her of events. Her response: "Judge Biehn is a King and he can do anything he wants." (Click Here for related story.)

  It this what has become of the legal system? A judge is viewed as king? How one lawyer speaks of another lawyer? Using polar logic, does that make a female lawyer a princess? If becoming a judge, would that make her a Queen?

  Furthermore, in a manner of speaking, I would never want a lawyer to represent me. Instead, if they took an oath to support and defend the Constitution, then if that was done I would benefit automatically.

  So, as for my legal position, if I could find one judge, dedicated to the quest of supporting and defending the Constitution, steadfast to an oath of office, I would of had my daughter home a long time ago. Therefore, I list my petition:

  (This should be finished by 12-26-2001.)

  1. My daughter was "born" outside the State's venue by default.

  2. If the State has venue, it resides where the act of insemination accorded.

  3. Burden is upon the moving party. The State moved upon me and seized my daughter. I timely challenged asking the Solicitor to explain to the court by what authority he moved and took possession of my child. Giving no response, the court intervened and in return, for the record, called me "absurd" and would not go beyond by giving some sort of rationale.

  4. In part, Bucks County violated my due process, by deliberate act, preventing me from amending the birth certificate in a timely manner, thereby allowing the clock to tick away, for the quest of establishing my daughter as a "legal resident" six months from her "birth" and thus seized upon my daughter on 02-23-2000, 17 days after artificial venue was created on 02-08-2000.

  Summary: